Every election year, the talking heads, the candidates, your peers, your friends, and your enemies all say that it's the most important election of our lifetime. You can't blame them. It usually SEEMS to be true. Just like every generation seems to think the sky is falling and they'll be the LAST generation to
be. The trend transcends politics and goes back thousands of years. So, understandably, many are jaded by the seemingly stale talking point of a quadrennial election being the single most defining national event you'll live through. So ... at the risk of sounding like Chicken Little ... the sky IS falling and this IS the most important election of our lifetime.
I've never experienced such division and fear and paranoia in this nation. This is more than a struggle between two well-to-do older guys vying for power and drowning in their own ambitions. This election is about choosing a direction at a very wide fork in the road. It's about saving this nation from its position of being on life support in the eyes of the world. It's about saving American lives. It's about choosing diplomacy over brutality. In a subversive way, it's a class war, a generational war, and a battle for ideological supremacy in a quickly shifting electorate.
I'm a registered Independent. Granted, a much more left leaning Independent, but an Independent nonetheless. I've voted Democrat, Republican, and third party depending on the position and the circumstance. This election year, I am proudly supporting Barack Obama for President. Unlike many younger people I've spoken to, this isn't a matter of holding my nose and picking the lesser of two evils. I don't agree with Obama on several important issues. His position on nuclear energy comes to mind (I'm opposed to the use of nuclear energy until some feasible way of dealing with the waste is created and implemented). I also disagree with his advocacy of clean coal (There's no such thing as clean coal currently. The only positive use of clean coal as far as I'm concerned is to develop the technology further and export it to nations who are currently using massive amounts of old and dirty coal technology. Namely, China). I'm very much opposed to partial birth abortion. I don't like the Reverend Wright ties (It's one of the few valid right-wing criticisms. Although, admittedly, they've been blown out of proportion). However, these disagreements are far outshadowed by his progressive and forward thinking positions on many key issues that I find much more important: the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, education funding and reform, his economic policies, his stance on diplomacy over bully tactics, and his pushes for transparency and involvement in national government, to name a few.
The Republican party has pulled out seemingly every stop in this election cycle. It's a smear campaign the likes of which made even Carl Rove blush. Directly or indirectly, Obama has been accused of being a Muslim, an infanticide supporter, a socialist, a black supremecist, a terrorist sympathizer, and non-citizen. Campaigns get ugly in every election, whether on a local, state, or national level. It's the nature of the beast. However, there is a point at which half-truths become blatant character assassination, and questions asked of an opponent go beyond policy differences and cross into hate-mongering fear tactics. The McCain campaign has crossed every line. This isn't to say that Barack Obama's campaign has clean hands, either. However, the differences seem to be glaring. Obama's criticisms of McCain tend to be mostly truths with fine print. McCain's criticisms of Obama tend to be blatant lies in bold. What amazes me is that people will spread this disinformation around with the casualty of a forwarded joke, when there are a plethora of credible news and fact-checking resources online at everyone's fingertips.
Even more amazing is how some of the decades old right-wing smears are taking hold, as if we've never heard them before. For example, the "socialist" label. It's one of the oldest Republican tricks in the book. And, lo and behold, with all the Democrats ever elected to high positions of power in this nation, the "socialism" has never happened. Curious. You can give any connotation to any word. Using the word "liberal" as a dirty word seems to have taken root in the psyche of the American public in recent years. Using the term "spreading the wealth" while talking about a simple roll-back of 8 year old tax cuts is borderline laughable. These arguments are moot. By right-wing definitions of "socialism" or "socialist behavior", Social Security is socialism. Medicare is socialism. The much heralded Wall Street Bail Out was socialism (or at least nationalizing lender failures while privatizing their profits). Any time a school is funded or a road is built ... any time minimum wage is raised or a tax break to ANY economic class is given ... THAT'S spreading the wealth. The argument being presented is thusly impotent. It's simply a matter of splitting hairs on policy and giving the term "spreading the wealth" a certain connotation against Obama's tax plans to strike fear into the hearts of people it either won't affect or would actually benefit from them in this election.
One of the only valid arguments presented by the Republicans in this election is Obama's lack of experience. It's a legitimate worry for many, and understandably so. Personally, I don't give much credence to it. Some of our greatest presidents had little experience before taking office. What's more important in this time is a first class intellect, the right temperment, vision, leadership, the ability to inspire, and being forward thinking. Obama's ability to garner support from some of the leading Republicans of our time is a testament to his ability to cross over and build bridges. We desperately need it these days.
By tomorrow's end, I'm predicting an Obama victory, and a decisive one. We NEED a clear victory after 8 years of stolen or shady elections. We NEED a mandate to make up so much of the ground that we've lost.
The Republican Party is in the throes of a horrible death, and thank God. Not to say that the Republican Party should be snuffed out, because I think quite the opposite. I think Republicans tend to do good work in state government. Their fundamental belief in Federalism plays to that. Conversely, I think they tend to be trainwrecks in national office, for the same reasons. But, what will die is NOT the Republican party. It will be the last 12 years of poisonous philosophy that has hijacked the party, hollowed it out, and turned into a broken shell of what it once was. Republicans used to be the party of principle and reform. That all seemed to change after Eisenhower, and it's been a slow, creeping progression toward the monster it has become. The Republican Party is not the one of your grandfather's generation ... or even your father's generation. It has turned into a party of fear-mongering, theocratic devisiveness. It's become the party of empty, flag-waving patriotism, used as accusatory gestures toward "the other side", who they would perceive as cowards and Godless haters of the American way. Their view is no longer based on political differences, but of ideological warfare of the filthiest kind. They have become a party that not only hates progressive ideas, but IDEAS in general. They perpetually sell the concept of going back to good old days that never existed in the first place. They champion the working class, the suburbanite middle income folks, and shun the cities and, on a larger scale, intellect itself. This is all contrary to their actual policies, which have long been hugely slanted toward the very wealthy IN these big cities they have now deemed not fit for "the real America". They have somehow turned the Democrats into the frightening big city elitists. How did this happen? Can any of you remember just a decade ago when, based on ACTUAL policies, the Democrats were seen as the party of the poor, the middle class, the working and suburban folks of America .... while the Republicans were seen as the almost exclusively white, elitist, big business party? Does anyone else find it odd how this switcheroo was allowed to happen almost seemlessly? I find it repugnant that the neo-cons can all but spit at New York City, the New York Times, and the so-called "media elite" who preside there, apparently deeming it part of the "fake America" they speak of ... all the while, standing on the rubble of the Twin Towers and using 9/11 to bolster their campaign of fear.
This recent era of Republican metamorphasis is going to leave them in shambles on November 5th. The party will be forced to re-group and re-consider its use of ideology over logic, its era of New McCarthyism, its disdain for intellect and change, its use of fear as distraction. What I hope to see is a re-emergence of the Republican Party that once was. The Rockefeller Republicans. The Eisenhower Republicans. It's already on the horizon, as our own Governor Bobby Jindal is evidence of. And, mark my words, if Obama is elected on November 4th, you will see Bobby Jindal on the national stage in 2012. He's the Republican answer to Obama: reform-minded, progressive within his own party, young, and (lest I forget) ... a minority. I think that times will get quite interesting on the political front in the coming years, and I'm looking forward to it. All things considered, I think it'll be a greater time for our nation ... and a turning point we desperately need.
Whatever your views, and whether you disagree with me or not ... get out and VOTE tomorrow. Democracy could use a shot in the arm.
Personally, it's my Superbowl. I'll be celebrating for most of the day .... and hoping for some of those pink states to turn blue faster than a choking victim.
Viva Democracy.